In reply to:
Joanie Rebo
@JoanieRebo
·
109d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
109d
The statement by @JoanieRebo quoting JD Vance's comment about turning the country over to people who 'don’t really have any stake in it' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue regarding leadership and societal values.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it implies a divisive viewpoint that could be harmful to childless individuals by suggesting they have less stake in the country. This could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does indirectly question the dignity of childless individuals, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards childless individuals, which is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes a broad generalization about a group of people, which is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by promoting a divisive viewpoint, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.