Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with substantive public issues, specifically the reform of the Supreme Court and its impact on democracy and communities. The tone is urgent and critical, aiming to provoke action and awareness about perceived threats to democratic principles and social justice.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but its strong language could be seen as polarizing.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language to criticize the Supreme Court justices.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness about the need for judicial reform, which can be seen as an effort to foster empathy and compassion for affected communities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but focuses on the actions and decisions of the Supreme Court. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to advocate for societal betterment through judicial reform. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address significant public concerns. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.