In reply to:
Andrew — e/acc
@astralmatrix
·
415d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
415d
Andrew — e/acc
@astralmatrix
·
415d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
415d
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
416d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a public discourse about the reliability and potential biases of Google's search engine, particularly in relation to political figures. The conversation includes multiple participants sharing their experiences and observations, and it calls for clarification from Google. The tone of the statement is skeptical and acknowledges the variability in search results.
- The statement does not cause harm directly but touches on a sensitive topic that could lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the functionality of a search engine rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the variability in search results and suggesting that experiences may differ. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment and providing additional context. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a potential issue with a widely used service, which could lead to improvements or clarifications. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.