In reply to:
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
416d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a claim about potential election interference and the functionality of Google's search engine. The tone is respectful and aims to contribute constructively to the discussion by acknowledging the partial correctness of the original statement while raising important questions.
- The statement strives to do no harm by not attacking the original poster and instead focusing on the content of the claim. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the partial correctness of the original claim and raising important questions for further discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue by addressing the claim respectfully and without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.