Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 22

The statement engages in a political discussion about voting behavior and the entitlement perceived by the Democratic Party regarding votes for third-party candidates. It questions the logic and ethics behind the claim that a vote for a third-party candidate is effectively a vote for a major party candidate, thus contributing to public discourse on electoral politics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language or actions, maintaining a neutral tone in its critique. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others, adhering to this principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by questioning a common political narrative, encouraging critical thinking. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites dialogue by asking Democrats to explain their position, rather than attacking individuals personally. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to question and critique a political stance, adhering to this principle. [+1]