Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement appears to be part of a public discourse as it engages with political issues and public figures, specifically discussing the merits and drawbacks of voting for Joe Biden versus Donald Trump. The tone is critical and seems to aim at influencing public opinion regarding political choices.
- The statement does not appear to do harm directly, but the use of the word 'humiliating' could be seen as emotionally charged and potentially divisive. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a focus on political critique rather than personal attacks. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in political critique but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.