Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 237

The statement engages with a public issue by discussing the balance of power among the branches of government and the role of the Supreme Court, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is assertive and the intent is to support the idea that the Supreme Court should not have unchecked power, aligning with the principles of democratic governance and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and aims to prevent potential harm by advocating for checks and balances, thus adhering to this principle. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by supporting the idea of balanced power and accountability, which are fundamental to a fair society. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by supporting a call for reforms without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by supporting reforms that aim to restore trust and accountability in the government. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important public issues with integrity. [+2]