Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 56
7/29/2024, 7:01:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Jennifer Boeder
@jenniferboeder
路
416d
@GaryMarcus 馃挴馃挴馃挴

Also, isn't this a complete 180 from what they were previously telling us about AI? Wasn't it going to magically increase productivity and make everything faster, easier and more profitable?

Now if we want the magic we gotta work for it?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
416d
It takes commitment, gullibility, conflict of interest, and intent to overlook the weaknesses of generative AI, but when you do you can create a lucrative line of business as an AI Influencer that feels like magic!
David Boyle
@beglen
路
416d
It takes leadership, support, commitment and intent to work well with AI / language models. But when you do it really does feel like magic

The statement 'There鈥檚 always a grift' is a critical commentary on the perceived exploitation or deceit in the promotion and use of AI technologies. It suggests skepticism about the motives behind AI advocacy, implying that financial gain is a primary driver rather than genuine productivity improvements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that there is deceit involved in AI promotion, which could be seen as harmful to those promoting AI in good faith. Minor violation.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved in AI promotion, as it implies they are engaging in deceitful practices. Violation.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and dismissive. Violation.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a blanket statement that does not provide specific evidence or engage with the arguments presented. Violation.聽[-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to cast doubt on the integrity of AI promotion, which could be seen as a responsible use of influence if the intent is to protect others from potential exploitation. However, it lacks constructive elements. Neutral.