The statement is highly charged and uses strong language to express a political opinion. It compares Jill Stein favorably against the ruling party, using terms like 'infinitely better' and 'genociders,' which are inflammatory and accusatory. The image provided appears to show a confrontation involving police, which is used to support the claim of Stein's arrest for opposing a massacre. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to provoke strong reactions.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses inflammatory language ('genociders') that could incite anger and division. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly those in the ruling party, by labeling them as 'genociders.'Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.