Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Insider Paper
@TheInsiderPaper
·
109d
The statement 'Why we don't have free school lunches or guaranteed housing...' in response to the announcement of $1.7 billion in new security assistance for Ukraine constitutes public discourse. It raises a critical question about domestic policy priorities and the allocation of government resources, engaging with broader societal issues such as education, housing, and national security.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of government spending priorities, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals or groups but rather questions policy decisions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting domestic issues that may be overlooked in favor of international aid. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning government priorities without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about societal issues, potentially contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging dialogue on important topics. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.