Brendan Carr
@BrendanCarrFCC
·
465d
The statement is critical of a public figure's comment on the progress of a government initiative. It engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of internet infrastructure funding and the accuracy of public statements about it. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, using phrases like 'misleading garbage' and 'without spending a…'.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses dismissive and confrontational language, which can be seen as harmful or disrespectful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly the public figure it criticizes, by using derogatory language. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticizing and dismissing the public figure's comment. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and dismissive language rather than providing a reasoned argument or engaging in a respectful discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.