In reply to:
Diego Castillo
@DiegoInNext
·
464d
The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the potential influence of tech giants on search results and the need for transparency. The conversation involves multiple individuals expressing concerns and seeking clarification on a public issue, which is the alleged manipulation of search results by Google.
- The statement by @DiegoInNext does not appear to cause harm directly. It raises a concern about transparency, which is a legitimate public issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by calling for transparency, which can lead to a more informed public. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by asking for transparency from Google rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for greater transparency, which can be seen as an effort to better society by ensuring fair and unbiased information access. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.