Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
the contextualized hot dam historian🥥🌴
@hotdamhistorian
·
111d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of electoral politics and the ethical considerations of voting for third-party candidates versus mainstream candidates.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the aggressive tone ('Shouts') could be seen as confrontational, which might indirectly cause emotional harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and it respects the privacy and dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational stance that may polarize rather than unite. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the opposing viewpoint without engaging in a meaningful discussion, and the use of 'evil' could be seen as a personal attack on those who disagree. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it promotes a divisive and confrontational approach. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.