Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 22

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing political issues and critiquing the current political system. The tone is critical and calls for systemic change, suggesting that the current political figures and system are corrupt and need to be replaced. The image supports the statement by comparing policy positions of various candidates, highlighting differences in their stances on key issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for systemic change rather than targeting individuals with personal attacks. However, it does label the current system as 'corrupt,' which could be seen as a strong accusation.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals to some extent but uses strong language like 'corrupt system,' which could be seen as disrespectful to those currently in power. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for policies that prioritize people over profit, such as Medicare for All and a $25 minimum wage. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current political system but could be seen as engaging in ad hominem arguments by labeling the system as 'corrupt.' [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for systemic change, which it believes will better society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform to call for political change, but the strong language used could be seen as lacking in integrity and respect.