In reply to:
Jared Goerke
@JaredGoerke
·
92d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
92d
The statement 'And what’s the grift, Jared?' is a direct reply to a conversation about political opinions and accusations of grifting. It engages with public issues and debates, specifically the political landscape and the behavior of public figures, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it implies an accusation without evidence, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the person it addresses, as it implies dishonesty or unethical behavior without substantiation, bordering on harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it makes a personal attack by questioning the integrity of the individual without providing a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.