Nikki Haley

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 42

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with international relations and political alliances, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical and cautionary, aiming to highlight perceived threats to freedom by associating certain countries and leaders with negative connotations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm individuals but uses strong language that could contribute to a polarized view of international relations. It does not promote harm but could be seen as fostering an 'us vs. them' mentality. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize entire nations and their leaders in a negative light, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it draws a clear line between 'friends' and 'enemies,' which can hinder nuanced understanding. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad generalizations and does not provide a platform for discussion or differing viewpoints. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to caution against certain international relationships, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society by protecting freedom. However, it does so in a divisive manner. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint. However, the responsibility and integrity of the message could be questioned due to its polarizing nature. [+1]