The statement expresses an opinion on how the Olympics should be managed, specifically suggesting that the event should rotate through a few established host cities. This touches on public issues related to the organization and logistics of a major international event, which can have significant economic, social, and environmental impacts.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral opinion on a logistical matter. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a constructive suggestion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to suggest a potential improvement for a major international event, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.