In reply to:
Jean-Louis Amat, phd 🇪🇺
@jl_amat
·
460d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
460d
The statement by @jl_amat engages in a discussion about the historical context and development of neurosymbolic AI, which is a substantive topic within the field of artificial intelligence. The tone is informative and aims to provide historical insight, contributing to the broader discourse on AI development.
- The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on providing factual information about the history of neurosymbolic AI. It does not contain any harmful language or intent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing historical context and acknowledging the contributions of others in the field, which fosters a sense of community and shared knowledge. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by adding to the conversation with relevant information and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.