The statement 'GenAI, So sorry, but we’re just not that into you. 🤷♂️' accompanied by the images of articles discussing the failure of Meta's celebrity AI chatbots and a critical review of the Humane AI Pin, constitutes public discourse as it engages with the broader societal issue of the effectiveness and reception of AI technologies. The tone is dismissive and somewhat humorous, indicating a critical stance towards the current state of consumer AI products.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive towards the efforts of those developing AI technologies. It maintains a light-hearted tone, which mitigates potential harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals as it does not target any specific person or group. It focuses on the technology rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses humor to convey a critical perspective, which can promote understanding and empathy by making the critique more relatable and less confrontational. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the technology itself rather than the individuals behind it. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.