In reply to:
Sasha Luccioni, PhD 🦋🌎✨🤗
@SashaMTL
·
449d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
449d
The statement by @SashaMTL, 'I have an unpublished piece about Jensen’s recent outrageous claims that I have held off on. But … damn,' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to generative AI and its implications, which is a topic of societal concern. The tone is critical and suggests a forthcoming critique of Jensen's claims.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the use of 'outrageous' could be seen as inflammatory. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects privacy and dignity. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critique. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement hints at a forthcoming critique but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in public discourse responsibly. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.