The statement questions the rationale behind segregating Zoom calls for Kamala Harris by race and gender. It appears to seek understanding and clarification on a public issue related to inclusivity and diversity practices.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is phrased as a question seeking clarification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for the rationale behind the practice. It does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the practice without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by raising a legitimate question about a public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.