In reply to:
GypsyNoLonger
@GypsyNoLonger
·
415d
The statement in question is part of a conversation that addresses a public issue, specifically the topic of segregation in the context of political strategies and historical figures. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a question seeking clarification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking information and clarification about a historical figure's stance on segregation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking a question rather than making a personal attack or ad hominem argument. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to the discussion in a respectful manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.