Reposted by Jake Tapper
Michael Trujillo
@mikehtrujillo
·
112d
The statement addresses a public issue related to press freedom and campaign practices, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is assertive and critical, aiming to highlight a perceived inconsistency between the campaign's actions and its stated values of freedom.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is critical but not harmful. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by pointing out a perceived inconsistency in campaign practices, encouraging transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.