Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political campaigns and the actions of public figures. The tone is accusatory and aims to hold Wesley Bell accountable for alleged actions and statements.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and potentially harmful to Wesley Bell's reputation. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Wesley Bell, as it publicly accuses him of lying and other actions without providing full context. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes direct accusations without inviting discussion or providing evidence. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes; it is purely accusatory. (0 points)Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes serious accusations without full context or evidence. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.