The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the limitations of current machine learning techniques, particularly in the context of driverless cars and high-level reasoning. It references a conversation with a public figure, Steven Pinker, and critiques the current state of AI technology, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of technology rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the limitations of current AI techniques, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected by these limitations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of current AI methods and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important technological issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.