The statement expresses strong condemnation of far-right influencers, specifically naming Andrew Tate, and attributes their disinformation to a riot that resulted in injuries. The tone is highly critical and uses strong language, which can be seen as inflammatory.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using derogatory language ('Fvck far-right influencers'). This can escalate tensions rather than promote constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it directly attacks a named individual in a derogatory manner. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement fails to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. Instead, it uses inflammatory language that can further polarize opinions. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the issue of disinformation in a constructive manner. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement aims to use influence to highlight the negative impact of disinformation, the approach lacks responsibility and integrity due to its inflammatory nature. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.