In reply to:
Tim Hulse
@timhulse
·
98d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
98d
The statement by @GaryMarcus, 'see my Next Decade in AI and the essay from sunday in my Substack,' in response to @timhulse's request for more details on alternatives to LLMs, constitutes public discourse. It engages with a substantive public issue—artificial intelligence and its future—by directing the audience to further detailed analysis and opinions on the topic.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It is neutral and informative. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by directing the audience to more detailed content on AI, which can foster empathy and compassion through informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing resources for further reading, without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by contributing to the public discourse on AI, a significant societal issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing informative content with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.