In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
97d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
97d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a substantive discussion about race, identity, and political figures, which are significant public issues. The tone of the statement is defensive and aims to clarify the intent behind the previous comment, focusing on how a public figure perceives the world rather than defending outdated rules.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but engages in a sensitive topic that requires careful handling to avoid potential harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying the intent behind the previous comment, though it could be more empathetic in addressing the concerns raised. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a disagreement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.