The statement and accompanying image express frustration over forgetting to release GPT-5. The context provided by the conversation with @GaryMarcus suggests a public interest in the release of GPT-5, touching on potential technical, safety, or political issues. However, the statement itself is more personal and lighthearted, focusing on the individual's mistake rather than engaging substantively with the public issues raised by @GaryMarcus.
- The statement does no harm and is lighthearted in nature, expressing personal frustration without negative impact on others.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the individual's own mistake.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is more of a personal expression rather than a response to the public discourse.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it is a personal expression rather than a substantive engagement with public issues.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.