Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and accompanying images discuss the perceived decline in enthusiasm and confidence in generative AI (GenAI) technologies, citing specific examples of setbacks and challenges faced by major tech companies. The tone is critical and somewhat pessimistic, suggesting that the initial excitement around GenAI is waning. The intent appears to be to inform and provoke thought about the current state and future of GenAI.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as contributing to a negative perception of GenAI technologies. However, it is based on factual reporting and analysis, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing specific examples and evidence to support its claims. It encourages readers to think critically about the current state of GenAI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting specific issues and challenges faced by GenAI technologies. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform and potentially influence public opinion about the state of GenAI, which can contribute to a more informed and critical public dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.