In reply to:
Biluzeira
@Biluzeira911
·
93d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a political debate about the qualifications and beliefs of public figures, specifically in the context of a political election and public health issues.
- The statement uses derogatory language ('bullshit') and dismisses the opposing viewpoint without constructive engagement, which can be seen as harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does show a lack of respect for the dignity of the person being criticized. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is dismissive and confrontational. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and dismissive language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it uses inflammatory language and does not contribute to a respectful dialogue. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.