In reply to:
Anita Malchiodi Albedi
@SchmaltzDiva
·
189d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the policies related to the Southern border and the role of the President in addressing these issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a call for action rather than an attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting that action is needed from the President, which can be seen as a constructive contribution to the dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It responds to a previous comment in a respectful manner. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public debate on policy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.