Robert Costa

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 158

The statement by Vice President Kamala Harris addresses former President Donald Trump's comments at a public event, which involves substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does criticize Trump's comments, which could be seen as harmful if not done constructively.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. However, it does call out Trump's comments, which could be seen as a form of public criticism. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing Trump's comments.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks. Referring to Trump's comments as 'the same old show' could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing public concerns, but the link to 'x.com' is unclear and could detract from the integrity of the message.