In reply to:
Serafim Batzoglou
@s_batzoglou
·
91d
The statement by @s_batzoglou and the reply to it engage in a substantive discussion about the progress and future of AI models, which constitutes public discourse. The reply challenges the accuracy of @s_batzoglou's numbers and promotes the author's own newsletter as a source of similar insights.
- The reply does not appear to cause harm directly, but the accusation of 'made up' numbers could be seen as dismissive or disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The reply could be seen as not fully respecting the dignity of @s_batzoglou by suggesting their numbers are fabricated without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The reply does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses @s_batzoglou's point without constructive engagement. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The reply does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the other person's point without providing a detailed counter-argument or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.