In reply to:
Stephen Roddy
@StephenRoddy
·
91d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
91d
The statement by @StephenRoddy criticizes individuals in the AI field who previously were involved in cryptocurrency and accuses them of lacking knowledge in math or engineering. The tone is dismissive and somewhat accusatory, suggesting that these individuals are pretending to have expertise they do not possess.
- The statement could be seen as harmful as it labels a group of people as 'grifters' and questions their knowledge and integrity without specific evidence. This could contribute to a negative and hostile environment. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it makes a broad and negative generalization about a group of people, potentially leading to cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and negativity by making unsubstantiated claims about others' knowledge and intentions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a personal attack on a group of people rather than addressing specific issues or engaging in a meaningful discussion about the topic at hand. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.