Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Jason Call 🇵🇸 Green Party WA02 JillStein2024 CM
@CallForCongress
·
110d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues, specifically geopolitical tensions involving the US, Israel, Hezbollah, and Iran. The tone is urgent and alarmist, aiming to mobilize public action against perceived warmongering policies.
- The statement uses strong language ('deep shit', 'we are so fucked') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than calming them. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the use of derogatory language towards 'warmongers' could be seen as disrespectful and lacking in dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses fear and urgency to drive its point, which can be counterproductive to fostering a compassionate dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses strong, accusatory language without offering a platform for discussion or understanding differing viewpoints. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and avoiding personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to mobilize public action, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the approach is aggressive and may not be the most effective way to achieve positive change. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, given the inflammatory language used. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.