Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 32

The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the geopolitical tensions involving Israel and the potential for broader conflict. It critiques a public figure's response to the situation, thus engaging in public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses inflammatory language ('drags us into WWIII') which could incite fear and panic, thus potentially causing harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of the public figure it critiques. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a dismissive tone towards Kamala Harris, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its inflammatory and accusatory nature. [-1]