Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue: the limitations and future of AI technology. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, aiming to highlight perceived flaws in current AI systems and the industry's response to these flaws.
- The statement aims to inform the public about the limitations of current AI, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by setting realistic expectations. However, the confrontational tone may alienate some readers. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad generalizations about people who have profited from AI, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of AI's limitations, but the confrontational tone may reduce empathy and compassion towards those working in the AI industry.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does generalize about a group of people, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to raise awareness about a significant issue in AI, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.