The statement expresses strong disapproval of the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) decision to allow a boxer with male chromosomes to compete in women's boxing. The tone is highly critical and emotionally charged, aiming to highlight perceived injustice and advocate for the withdrawal of the athlete in question.
- The statement uses strong language ('disgrace,' 'disgusting') that could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially inciting negative reactions or hostility. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the athlete in question, referring to them as 'a man' and calling for their withdrawal, which could be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on condemnation and outrage. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a personal attack on the athlete and the IOC without offering a reasoned argument or solution. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given its inflammatory and accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.