The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of advancements in large language models (LLMs) and their role in achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). The tone is analytical and somewhat skeptical, suggesting that bigger LLMs may not be the critical path to AGI despite recent achievements.
- The statement does no harm and is a reasoned opinion, contributing to a constructive dialogue about the development of AGI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a critical perspective on the assumption that larger LLMs are the key to AGI. It encourages deeper thinking and analysis. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the technological aspects rather than individuals or organizations. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.