Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 167
8/2/2024, 12:09:14 AM
X
In reply to:
🔻 redjonny 🔻☭🦇
@Redcommiejonny
·
188d
@Frances_Fisher @NathanJRobinson @marwilliamson She's a Zionist, might as well vote for Kopmala. I ' ll pass on both
Frances Fisher
@Frances_Fisher
·
188d
@NathanJRobinson We could have had a robust discussion.
@marwilliamson

https://marianne2024.com/issues/
Nathan J Robinson
@NathanJRobinson
·
188d
This is extraordinary: Harris is just ditching every good progressive thing she supported one by one and claiming she's changed her mind.

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about political stances and affiliations, specifically related to Kamala Harris and Marianne Williamson. The statement 'Since I have never used that word in relationship to myself, what you’re actually saying is that I am a Jew.' is a response to a comment that labels someone as a Zionist. This statement touches on sensitive topics related to identity and political labels, and it is important to analyze how well it upholds the principles of respectful and constructive public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but it could be interpreted as defensive or confrontational, which might escalate tensions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement touches on personal identity, which requires careful handling to respect privacy and dignity. The response could be seen as an attempt to clarify or correct a mischaracterization, but it could also be perceived as sensitive or potentially inflammatory. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to focus on correcting a perceived mislabeling, which might not foster a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but it does not contribute to constructive criticism or dialogue either. It is more of a defensive response to a label that the speaker finds inaccurate or offensive.