Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 94

The statement 'they are trying to raise terabucks without actually having product in hand' is a critical comment on the business practices of a company, likely referring to OpenAI, in the context of developing GPT-5. The tone is skeptical and somewhat accusatory, suggesting that the company is seeking significant funding without having a tangible product ready. This statement engages in public discourse as it addresses concerns about transparency and accountability in the tech industry, particularly in the development and funding of advanced AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as undermining the credibility of the company in question. It is important to ensure that such claims are substantiated to avoid misinformation.ย [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy as it does not target individuals but rather a company. However, it could be seen as damaging to the company's reputation if not backed by evidence.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical without offering constructive feedback or solutions.ย [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence to support the claim. It could be seen as a personal attack on the company's practices.ย [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to raise a concern about business practices, which can be seen as an attempt to hold the company accountable. However, it lacks a constructive approach to the issue.