In reply to:
#Uncommitted zeDotenator 🔨🌹🏳️🌈🇮🇹🇵🇸🇺🇦
@zeDotenator
·
187d
The statement appears to be a response to a conversation about a public figure, Marianne Williamson, and her interactions with delegates and volunteers. The tone is apologetic and respectful, indicating a willingness to engage and correct a misunderstanding. The content addresses a public issue related to political engagement and campaign activities, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement strives to do no harm by expressing regret and a willingness to engage, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in any form of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the situation and expressing a desire to have met with the delegates. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a potential mistake by indicating that the information did not reach the speaker and expressing regret. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.