In reply to:
D J Strauss
@DJSNJ01
·
279d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about military policy and its role in national and international security. The tone is measured and aims to clarify the speaker's position on the necessity of a strong military while advocating for its prudent use.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a balanced approach to military use, suggesting that while a strong military is necessary, it should be used judiciously. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by using an analogy (comparing the military to a surgeon) to explain a complex issue in a relatable way. This fosters empathy and compassion by emphasizing the importance of avoiding conflict when possible. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by directly addressing a question and providing a reasoned response without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing thoughtfully to a public debate on military policy. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.