Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 95
8/2/2024, 1:53:34 PM
X
In reply to:
joe atikian
@JoeAtikian
·
281d
@GaryMarcus I didn't bother taking any cuz I've done this so many times that it's shown itself to be very reliable.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
281d
@JoeAtikian screenshots please
joe atikian
@JoeAtikian
·
281d
@GaryMarcus I asked llama and chat how many trips it would take me to cross the river in my boat.
Both Saud they need more info.
Llama then guessed it would take one trip, assuming there were no other constraints.

Wow.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
281d
Another day, another model, another miss.

Making a model bigger and slightly better DOESN’T MAKE IT AGI.

The statement and the preceding conversation revolve around the discussion of AI models and their capabilities, specifically in the context of solving a river crossing riddle. The tone is lighthearted and conversational, focusing on the performance of AI models in problem-solving scenarios. The intent appears to be to share observations and insights about AI behavior, with a suggestion to compile these insights into an article for further discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and conversation do no harm and are focused on sharing observations about AI models, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding and empathy by discussing the limitations and capabilities of AI models in a constructive manner. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive and does not involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]