In reply to:
Radierkopf Homer
@radierkopfhomer
·
89d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
89d
Brian Schwartz
@schwartzbCNBC
·
89d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to election integrity and the actions of a high-profile public figure, Elon Musk. The tone is inquisitive and demands transparency and accountability, which are relevant to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but calls for an investigation, which can be seen as a responsible action in the context of public accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a focus on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by asking specific questions that seek to clarify the situation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for an investigation rather than making unfounded accusations. It does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by calling for transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.