In reply to:
Andy Berman
@berman66
·
89d
The statement by @GaryMarcus in response to @berman66 engages in a public discourse about the current state of technology, specifically AI and its perceived bubble. The tone is somewhat defensive and implies that @berman66 has not been paying attention to previous discussions or writings by @GaryMarcus. The statement could be seen as dismissive, which may hinder constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could be seen as unproductive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of @berman66 by implying they are uninformed without providing constructive feedback. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it assumes a defensive posture. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses @berman66's question without addressing it substantively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.