The statement critiques a past comment made by Josh Shapiro, highlighting its problematic nature even if it was made during his college years. The tone is critical but also somewhat self-reflective, as the author compares Shapiro's comment to their own less harmful college musings. The image provides context to the critique by showing the original comment made by Shapiro.
- The statement aims to highlight the harm in Shapiro's past comment, which can be seen as an attempt to do no harm by calling out harmful rhetoric. However, it does not directly promote understanding or empathy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of Shapiro by not delving into personal attacks but focuses on the content of his past comment. However, the original comment by Shapiro, as shown in the image, does not respect the dignity of Palestinians. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging that people can have bad takes in their youth, but it does not extend empathy or compassion towards Shapiro or the Palestinians mentioned in the original comment.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Shapiro's past comment without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the content rather than Shapiro as an individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.