Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
Β·
91d
The statement and the subsequent conversation critique the reliability and accuracy of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. The tone is highly critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived flaws and errors in AI responses. The intent appears to be to question the current capabilities of AI and to caution against overestimating its potential.
- The statement uses strong language and sarcasm, which could be seen as harmful or dismissive. It does not strive to do no harm, as it could contribute to a negative perception of AI without constructive feedback.Β [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the developers or researchers working on AI. It engages in a form of cyberbullying by mocking the technology and those who support it.Β [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses ridicule to make a point.Β [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism. While it points out flaws, it does so in a mocking manner rather than offering solutions or engaging in a productive dialogue.Β [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.