In reply to:
cantnot
@cantnot
·
301d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
301d
The statement by @cantnot addresses a public issue, specifically the political establishment's role in perpetuating systemic problems and marginalizing disruptors. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that political figures maintain their careers by upholding the status quo and sidelining those who challenge it.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that political figures are acting in self-interest, which could be seen as harmful to their reputations. However, it does not use inflammatory language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes a system rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the political establishment as a whole rather than targeting specific individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight systemic issues, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by encouraging discourse on political accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.